Video Credit: Ben Titus
SAWKET™ is an interface that is compatible with M-LOK® accessories and available as aluminum inserts to intlet into rifle stocks. The interface consists of a pocket, sized to accept the locating bosses of M-LOK®, and a threaded hole to accommodate the standard screw size used with the M-LOK® accessories. The forend inserts provide a clean appearance and strong connection. The inserts are less prone to bending and deformation from repetitive use or misuse of the standard M-LOK® T-nuts.
The SAWKET™ inserts allow the user to quickly convert the rifle for various uses by attaching Picatinny or Arca-Swiss dovetail rails to the forend, along with other M-LOK® accessories. Our line consists of various lengths of universal fit forend inserts that can be inlet into the bottom or side of the forend and secured by fasteners and t-nuts installed in the stock. Low-profile compatible Arca-Swiss/RRS dovetail rails accompany the inserts. The SAWKET™ inserts may then quickly and cleanly accept picatinny and Arca-Swiss dovetail sections to attach a bipod or tripod. Side rails may be utilized as an attachment point for accessory electronics and optics, along with add-on weights.
SAWKET™ insert install in a composite stock
SAWKET™ Side inserts for the JAE-700 Chassis
Video Credit: Joe Faulkner
Check out the training tab above and come be a part of our 2019 training season.
Video Credit: Bobby Foster
It is time again for change. Mrs. Sawtooth's time in Washington and the Army comes to an end. Our family has decided to head to Utah for civilian life, the move in June/July. We are excited about the future, although the move and leaving our friends in Washington will be tough.
Much of the Winter and Spring business activity will focus on our training classes, developing some new products, and getting set up for the move. Anybody that has been to the shop lately might get a laugh out of what that last part is about... (keep an eye on the Yard Sale).
Sawtooth Rifles aims to get through the transition as seamlessly as possible. From past shop moves we know that most of the unknowns are on the landing end, and getting spindles turning again takes time. The goal is to make the move without rifle builds pending and then start fresh without a wait list. To that end, the plan for rifle builds is as follows:
Phase 1: Beginning Jan 1, we will not accept new rifle builds until we have a really good idea of where we will be on the wait list by Spring. We aim to reduce the administrative time involved in new projects to allow for completion of existing projects. If you have been directed to this article as a response to a rifle build inquiry, please understand the need and accept our sincere apology.
Phase 2: Once we have rifle builds caught up (estimated March/April for projects not held up by parts) we will accept select projects that we can get done within days, not months. These projects will be limited to re-barrels and builds based on custom actions and chassis from parts on hand or quickly obtainable. (The days of blueprinting Remingtons and "yeah, I can make that stock work I guess" may be over for good.)
Phase 3: Back to work in Utah, ASAP!
Note: This article is under development. Judge accordingly...
The mechanical limit of long range shooting is essentially the furthest distance you could shoot in a given atmosphere by dialing the elevation turret to the end of its travel. Sure, you could shoot further by dialing to this point and then using recital holdover or even further by dialing, adding all of the recital holdover, and then adding Kentucky windage but this is beyond the limitation of the optic's internal mechanism.
It is often of value, or at least entertaining to determine what the mechanical limit of a long range rifle system would be. If you are paying for and traveling to an extended range class or match, you better do your homework ahead of time and be sure that the equipment you are showing up with is up to the challenge. Older generation scopes of higher magnification with 1" or even 30mm tubes can be limiting when it comes to long range shooting.
Every factor of ballistics comes into play for this determination, so explore the variables. Usually a cartridge is already selected and the scope is mounted, but you can investigate different projectiles to see if one would serve better than the other. In extended range shooting, we are often beyond the distance where a trajectory comparison would show where a slower but higher BC bullet has less drop than a slightly lower BC but faster launching lighter bullet.
For this analysis, we will use the mechanics of one of the Sawtooth Rifles training rental rifles with a Nightforce ATACR F1 5-25x56 riflescope shooting Hornaday 6.5 Creedmoor ammunition with the 140 ELD Match bullet launching at 2780 fps. The optic's specifications of interest are:
Total internal elevation adjustment range (per Nightforce specifications) : 120 MOA or 35 Mrad
Scope base cant: 20 MOA or 5.8 Mrad
There are two ways to go about determining the mechanical limit of a scopes internal adjustment. The most accurate method would be to dial the turret from the zero condition to the end of it's travel in the up direction, while keeping track of revolutions.
We can also use math if the above method is not feasible, or when using this concept to make decisions prior to purchasing an optic or scope mount. For this analysis, we will use the math approach. By doing this, we assume that the adjustment range used to zero the rifle is insignificant, but in reality we are using some of the elevation adjustment to get zeroed.
Using the math approach, we simply divide the total elevation range in two, the usable "up" portion and the wasted "down" portion and then account for the elevation gained by mounting it on a canted base. For the Nightforce ATACR F1 above, the math goes as follows:
1/2 of total internal elevation adjustment = 60 MOA or 17.5 Mrad
elevation gained from 20 moa canted mount = 20 MOA or 5.8 Mrad
total usable "up" elevation adjustment range = 80 MOA or 23.3 Mrad
By comparing this limit to our ballistics from the "Getting to know the Shooter ballistics app" blog post, we have a good estimate on what our mechanical limitation in that atmosphere would be. In Figure 1, you can see that our mechanical limit of long range shooting would be found at approximately 1975 yards by finding where 23.3 Mrad would be in the Path column, just past the transonic distance. We can also see that using another 5 mils of reticle holdover would get us to 28.8 Mrad, and to almost 2200 yards. Although, this is beyond what we are calling the mechanical limitation.
In summary, it is very easy to compare the mechanical limitation of an optic to your ballistics to determine how far you can shoot. This can be a decision factor when purchasing an optic or selecting scope mounts. Perhaps an optic decision could be based off of function instead of emotion or brand recognition.
There happens to be an optic in the stable at Sawtooth Rifles that was purchased for the science of shooting as far as possible while retaining a 100 yard zero. This particular scope is a fixed 16x56mm from IOR with a 35mm tube. It boasts 150 MOA of internal adjustment range, and when mounted on a custom made 60 MOA base, we get 135 MOA (39 mrad) of usable "up" travel which would get us right to the top of that solution chart in Figure 1. When mounted on the .338 Edge, it is entertaining!
© 2018. Sawtooth Rifles LLC, all rights reserved.
Note: This article is still being developed. Judge accordingly...
The Shooter ballistics application is a powerful ballistics calculator for mobile devices . It is a very useful tool at a bargain price. It is used during our training classes to create commonality amongst our students and this article is offered as a way to get started with using the app before our classes.
The app Shooter can be found in the App Store or Play Store from your mobile device. Once the app is downloaded and opened, the following information should get the rifleman off to a good start on setting preferences and creating a profile for the rifle and ammunition.
As with all computing, "garbage in equals garbage out" holds true. The app will give you a solution no matter what inputs you give it. It is important to understand what the inputs are and how they relate to your particular rifle. The Shooter manual linked at the bottom of the article has a great write up on what each parameter is. Inputting environmental conditions is as important as knowing which bullet you shoot. If you are shooting in Wyoming but your app still thinks you are at home in Texas, you are likely going to miss your target. With a data signal to the device, atmospheric conditions can be downloaded within the Shooter app from a nearby weather station, likely an airport. In many cases in the western landscape, the closest weather station may be many miles away. This data is better than what your app remembers from your last shooting session, but getting data for your AO from a handheld weather meter, such as a Kestrel, is far better. You can input this weather data manually or possibly take advantage of a Bluetooth connection between the mobile device and the weather meter. Setting up this connection takes some reading in the weather meter manual and Shooter reference materials.
Using environmental data from the weather station or hand held meter necessitates an understanding of how the air pressure is reported. Air pressure is reported as either Station Pressure or Barometric Pressure. Station Pressure is an absolute pressure, while Barometric Pressure has been referenced to sea level conditions. Using Barometric pressure for ballistics requires knowing the altitude on site. Station pressure is a better input to ballistics calculators because knowing the altitude is not necessary. A further explanation is available on the Applied Ballistics site, available at the link at the bottom of the article. The important part of this air pressure discussion is knowing what you have and telling the calculator what you are using. Android: If using Station Pressure from your Kestrel handheld weather meter, you need to tell the Shooter app that "pressure is absolute" in the preferences.
Density Altitude (DA) is another parameter to study. In short, DA is a parameter that is a combination of air pressure, temperature, and relative humidity. Using DA makes communications cleaner and less prone to error as we only have one input instead of three if entering data manually. It is recommended to select "Use Density Altitude" in the preferences. DA can be thought of as the air density factor that the bullet sees.
After downloading and starting the app, a good first step is to set up the options in the preferences. For iPhone users, access the app preferences by tapping on the iPhone "settings" app and scroll down to and tap on the Shooter app in the list. Android users have access to the settings screen from within the Shooter app by tapping on the menu button on the upper right hand corner of the main screen.
Recommended preference setting changes from default:
The preferences parameters can be investigated in the Shooter manual linked at the bottom of this article.
To build a profile for our "Sawtooth Demo1" rifle and the 6.5 Creedmoor Hornady ammunition, follow these steps
1. Add a firearm
2. Enter "Sawtooth Demo1 6.5 Creedmoor" as the rifle name, then continue with the following properties and save the rifle profile. Keep this rifle saved on your list for use in our classes.
3. Add an ammunition profile to the firearm.
4. Select "Manually" then enter "140 ELD-Match Hornaday" as the bullet name and continue with the following properties. Save the bullet profile.
5. Select the ammuntion
6. Enter field and atmospheric conditions, then calculate a solution.
In the solution mode, the solution can be viewed as a heads up display (HUD), chart, or graph. You can toggle between the views and each view has a menu option. Explore the menu to see the capabilities of the calculator. In the HUD, the menu opens a Range Calculator (calculator to calculate distance to targe based on target size and an angular measurement taken with the reticle), a tool to find the look angle using the devices sensors, and the option to switch between wind and lead inputs. In the table view, the menu includes the option to switch between showing wind drift and lead, as well as a feature to send the chart as an email. In the graph view, the menu allows to toggle between bullet path and wind drift. There is also a button that allows comparing bullets by adding multiples to the graph. The compared bullets have to be under the same firearm (a "shooter hack" for comparing different cartridges is shown later).
To edit a profile for a firearm or ammunition
To add your firearm, or firearms to the ballistics calculator, follow the above steps and add your firearm. You will need to find or measure the parameters needed. These parameters can most likely be found in your rifle and scopes manufacturers catalog or website. Sight Height can be measured as the distance from the center of the bore to the center of the scope tube. This measurement should be taken with care but is not all that critical. A number within 1/16th of an inch will serve our purposes. Until we prove otherwise, leave the Elevation and Windage Correction Facotrs as 1.0.
To add your ammunition, you can select your bullet from the bullet library if possible. Some newer projectiles are not listed, such as the 140 ELD-M we used above during the time of this writing. If you need to enter you projectile parameters manually, the bullet manufacturers list ballistic coefficients and usually the length. The length can be measured with calipers on a component bullet if that dimension can not be found. Be sure to match the Drag Model to the Ballistic Coefficient numbers found. Muzzle velocity should be measured with your ammunition and rifle using a chronograph in the weather you will be shooting in. If you are not able to get your muzzle velocity, an educated guess from the ammunition manufacturer or reloading manual will serve the purposes of experimenting with ballistics but will fail you in long range shooting.
Shooter website - http://www.shooterapp.net/
Shooter manual - http://www.shooterapp.net/manual.php
Applied Ballistics: Barometric Pressure vs. Station Pressure - http://appliedballisticsllc.com/ufaqs/barometric-pressure-vs-station-pressure/
© 2018. Sawtooth Rifles LLC, all rights reserved.
As popular and mainstream as long range shooting has become in the years since I started building rifles, I still sense confusion from my new customers and clients over some of the basic concepts involved. I believe this is partially due to several names and acronyms that get passed around for the same subject. In this article, that subject is angular measurements which are used to measure or brag about a rifle's accuracy as well as the units on what happens in the guts of your riflescope when you start cranking turrets.
The concept of measuring an angle might cause flashbacks to your high school geometry class, but the basic math involved is necessary to manipulate a rifle and scope to shoot long range. The math involved is nothing more than addition and subtraction of angular measurements. Those angular measurements just have units that tend to draw confusion. It is my goal that this article clears that up for the shooters. We will dive right into using angular measurements to manipulate your rifle scope. Using angular measurements to discuss accuracy should be elementary once we get refreshed on the concept of angular measurements.
When you throw a football, you are launching a projectile at some angle relative to your line of sight. You look at your receiver, but instinct reminds you about gravity,and you somehow calculate a trajectory in your head and release the football at an angle that sets the trajectory for the pass. I am baffled at how effective the human can be at this task without even scratching numbers into the dirt. As a shooter we are doing the same thing. We do have higher standards for accuracy and most likely are attempting to connect with the receiver at much further distances. We have the ability to measure things like our bullet's speed and its characteristics of flight, and the distance to our target with great certainty. Somewhat recent advancements in optics and ballistics calculators let us precisely account for gravity even at budget prices. As technical as all this sounds, all we are doing with the rifle scope to compensate for gravity's effect on the projectile over our shot distance is adjusting the angle between the line of sight and the bore angle. Because the human gets to talk during this adjustment, things can still get messy.
"What was your come-up?"
"What is that in minutes?"
"I don't know, just come down 2 clicks"
Going back to geometry class for a minute, an angular measurement is best shown as the arc of a fraction of the circumference of a circle, the crust on a piece of the pie. In shooting, that slice becomes very thin which comes into play as the small-angle approximation (more on that in a bit). There are two units of measurements that we use to measure angles, or arcs of a circle, degrees and radians. A full circle encompasses 360 degrees, which is knowledge most people have an understanding of. That circle also has 2 x Pi radians of circumference, where Pi is a number that relates the diameter of a circle to its circumference. Remember that the circumference equals Pie times the diameter? The length of an arc comprising a fraction of a circle is equal to the radius of the circle times the angle (in radians) of that slice of the pie that makes the arc. This is shown in Figure 1. below.
When we bring this geometric relationship to the shooting world, r is the distance to our target which would typically make the circle very big. We aren't concerned with the entire circle, but only the small section of arc length, s. The components of the circle above, are shown below in Figure 2 along with the addition of the bullet's flight trajectory and our calculated bullet drop.
In rifle shooting, the distance to target (r) and relatively flat trajectory of the bullet's flight makes the angular correction (Theta) small. As Theta becomes small, you can see that the arc length (s) becomes really close to the length of the straight line shown as the bullet drop. A somewhat complicated mathematical proof can show this, but we can also see it happening on Figure 2. You can see that if the angle Theta becomes a fraction of what is drawn, that the arc length and bullet drop components of the diagram would essentially overlap and be the same length for all practical purposes. This is known as the Small Angle Approximation and is the basis of how we make an angular adjustment to our optic to compensate for the linear correction of our calculated bullet drop. The numbers we work with in shooting are fractions of a degree, or thousandths of a radian. Small angles... Also, the relationships shown only work when we think and compute with the unitless angular measurement of radians. We can convert degrees to radians and proceed with the above math if need be.
The angular corrections our ballistic calculators and scopes talk in are Minutes of Angle and milradians. A minute of an angle is 1/60th of that angle. A second of angle would be 1/3600 of that angle. Talking in degrees, a MOA is 1/60th of a degree. A milradian is 1/1000th of a radian. In this case "mil" comes from the latin derived prefix of the metric system milli (and should technically be milliradians), not the military. There is a third and hopefully soon forgotten angular measurement called IPHY (inches per hundred yards) that still exists in some realms. IPHY isn't really an angular measurement and probably originally existed as an approximation of MOA that only works because our optics didn't adjust as well and our calculations were not as good. At any rate, I have not found a modern scope turret with these graduations so I think the industry agrees with me.
Back to the confusing lingo, we have two systems of angular measurements in use with many names for each. Minutes of Angle is often referred to in short form as "minutes" and "MOA". Milradians are commonly referred to as "Mils", "mildots", "mrad", and "milrads". Clicks would be each increment of graduation on a scope turret, of either system. Thinking in and communicating in clicks should be avoided to prevent confusion and error. Counting clicks to adjust for a correction when there are numbers on the turret is just silly. If one were to be confident in where their turret was currently at and could calculate the difference to their next come up, one could count clicks to get there in a case where they didn't want to take their eye off the target or be able to see the turrets in the dark.
Minutes of Angle and milradians are essentially two different languages to talk in for the rifle shooter. When I am asked which is better my answer is the question "What language are your friends speaking?" If you are shooting a Precision Rifle Series match with an MOA scope and everyone is talking wind holds in Mils, you are at a disadvantage unless you can quickly do the conversion in your head without mistakes. Vice versa at an F-Class match if you show up with a Mil scope. For the less established uses, either will work just fine. MOA scopes have finer increments of angular adjustment with 1/4 minute clicks than a Milrad scope with 1/10 Mil adjustments (like how I used every variant of the lingo there?). Even finer adjustment increments can be obtained with a scope set up with 1/8 MOA clicks which are typically used in Benchrest and F-Class competition, as well as varmint shooting. Using the Mil system lets the shooter remember a number like 8.7 mils rather than 29 7/8 MOA which can be a benefit in a high paced sport like the Precision Rifle Series.
We have discussed making these corrections with the scope's turret, but using a reticle with subtend marks can accomplish the same adjustment. You just need to know what the reticle graduations mean, and if it depends on the optical plane that the reticle is projected upon. With first focal plane scopes, the reticle changes with magnification and stays true to the objects in view. With second focal plane scopes, the reticle stays the same size to the eye and changes relative to the object in view as you change magnification. In the case of second focal plane scopes, you have to know what magnification the reticle subtends true at.
In today's market, it is hard to find a new scope that has mixed systems but thanks to the military being hard headed and a certain manufacturer being slow to adapt (cough, Leupold), those do exist. There are many scopes out there collecting dust with MOA turrets and Mil-Dot reticles. To use those scopes effectively, one had to truly understand the angular measurements and keep track of some conversions. Relating MOA to milrads is simple and starts with the following equation and breaking it down as follows:
360 degrees = 2 Pi radians
360 degrees (60 MOA/degree) = 2 Pi radians (1000 milrads/radian)
21600 MOA = 6283 milrads
1 MOA = .2908 milrad
3.438 MOA = 1 milrad
The other useful calculation is to see what distance our angular measurement covers on target. We will use the common sight in distance of 100 yards for this analysis. Making a jump from our above small angle approximation discussion, a milrad covers 1/1000th of the distance to the target. One radian would be the same as the distance to the target, except that is not a small angle anymore and the error of approximation becomes significant.
s = r Theta
in other words:
height on target per milrad = distance to target (1/1000)
height on target per milrad at 100 yd = 100 yds (1/1000)(36 in/yd)
height on target per milrad at 100 yd = 3.6 in
and to show this in the common turret graduation of 1/10 milrads:
height on target per 1/10th milrad at 100 yd = 3.6 in/10 = .36 in
The above math should quickly dissuade you of the myth that the milrad system is metric. It actually doesn't care what units of linear distance you use. The math is easier if we use the metric system but it works the same in any system. For example:
height on target per milrad at 1000 meters = 1000 meters (1/1000)
height on target per milrad at 1000 meters = 1 meter
height on target per milrad at 16 fathoms = 16 fathoms (1/1000)
height on target per milrad at 16 fathoms = 16/1000 fathoms (6 ft/fathom) (12in/ft)
height on target per milrad at 16 fathoms = 1.152 in
If our units of distance to the target and height on the target are the same, we simply divide by 1000. It is when we start measuring in yards thinking in inches that requires the introduction of conversions.
We can use the MOA system to do the same math with the additional step of adding in the conversion of MOA to milrads. The commonly needed example would be the height on target at 100 yards that a MOA covers, which is found as follows, and starting from the work above:
height on target per MOA at 100 yards = 100 yards (1/1000)(36 in /yd)(.2908 milrad/MOA)
height on target per MOA at 100 yards = 1.046 in
The above relationship is the lure of the MOA system, where it just happens to work out that one MOA covers approximately one inch at 100 yards (and is where that IPHY concept came from in the past). Using this approximation:
1 MOA at 500 yards is approximately 5 inches
1 MOA at 1000 yards is approximately 10 inches and so on.
In summary, thanks to the small angle approximation we can use an angular dimension to move our point of impact or measure a linear distance on target. To move our point of impact, we just need to listen to our ballistics calculator and tell our scope how far to go. The measurement of a distance, whether it be a group size on target or the distance from the target that a miss strikes the dirt can be taken by using the scale in a scope's reticle and expressed as an angular measurement in Mils or MOA just the same. When working with a spotter, it is important to be thinking and communicating in the same language.
Now, why do they make scope bases marked 20 MOA?
Rifle scopes have an internal adjustment range. The adjustments can only go so far in either direction until the internal mechanism runs out of travel. Most scopes are made so that half of the adjustment range in in the "up" direction and half is in the "down" direction from their mechanical center but some examples exist where the engineers have designed them to be biased toward having more "up" than "down". A rifle setup doesn't need much "down" travel unless you were to try shooting while standing on your head. Some down is needed from the physical center of adjustment to get zeroed, but certainly not half of the entire range. Figure 3 shows a scopes internal adjustment range in an unbiased configuration.
For the following analysis, angles in the diagrams are greatly exaggerated.
The line of sight (view of what you are aiming at) can be anywhere within the total adjustment range. Our long range math, and probably past experience with a football tells us that we have to point the barrel upward to start the projectile along its needed trajectory. Figure 4 shows the diagram from above with the bore pointed upward and the line of sight horizontal, the situation needed for a shot at distance. You can see that we use some of the "up" direction to accomplish this and at a point we would run out of scope travel to shoot further.
In the graphic above, you can also see how much of the total adjustment range is unusable. By canting the scope downhill relative to the bore axis, we can bias the total adjustment range to obtain more in the usauble, or "up" direction. This is shown in Figure 5 with the difference as some angle between the Bore Axis and Center of Adjustment Range. Scope bases are commonly available as 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 MOA. For extreme distance shooting, bases can be custom made with much more cant built in but you can get into the case of not being able to sight in at a more conventional close range.
In the final diagram (Figure 6), the maximum "up" adjustment is shown by tilting the bore axis upward until the line of sight and maximum "up" lines coincide, yielding the furthest shot possible with turret adjustments with this rifle setup. You can see how the bore axis has gotten steeper to the line of sight in each step from Figure 3 - 6 allowing a higher trajectory.
Modern tactical rifle scopes built on 34 and 35mm tubes combine ample total adjustment range with the magnification needed for extended range shooting with common cartridges and high ballistic coefficient bullets. In extreme conditions, range can be gained by adding reticle holdover to turret adjustments. Most projectiles are falling fast in this realm, so gained distance can be minimal but it is entertaining to calculate a trajectory and attempt these shots for science. A second focal plane scope with the magnification backed off to half of the calibrated magnification doubles the amount of reticle holdover too...
© 2018. Sawtooth Rifles LLC, all rights reserved.
My 2012 Colorado Mule Deer hunt started out as many do, making that decision on which unit to put in for. Do you use your points and hunt, or do you add another point to build for that trophy hunt? I like to hunt instead of count points, so I opted to try to get a license this year. I consulted with a local friend who turned me onto the unit he and his family primarily hunt. He had killed a great buck there last year and was back in point building mode but I had a feeling I could talk him into telling me where to go (and it wouldn't be H-E-double hockey sticks).
So with that plan, I was happy to get notice that I did draw the license but then it got pushed to the back burner with a trip to Africa, Wyoming Pronghorn, and Colorado Archery Elk hunts to plan first (along with some rifles to build and a few responsibilities with the family.)
With a couple weeks to go, I did what I always do and wonder why later: decided to build a new rifle. I had build #8 in the works which reaffirmed my appreciation for the concept of a light, mild kicking, backpacking rifle. The #9 rifle, a 7x57 Mauser built on a Remington 700 action, came together quickly and proved to be worthy of the hunt after a second trip to the range. It shot the 140 gr Nosler Accubonds into groups just over 1/2 MOA with very little load development. Not so worried about squeezing more out of it, I proceeded to smack the steel targets at our range using the holdovers on the Vortex BDC reticle and felt confident in a 350 to 400 yd shot with the little rifle. That was good, as I was out of time to do any more practice or make any changes to the load.
So the little rifle and I were off for our hunt down near Salida, CO. We took along #7 as well, since we didn't really know what we were getting into. I had planned to take #4, but it got a last minute chance to go hunting with Sam from Gannett Ridge in another unit. I didn't have much of a plan, but I was on my way!
I arrived at the trailhead just a little past midnight - just enough time to catch some Z's before opening morning. The Lost Creek Inn (the camper on the back of the old Dodge) makes for a pretty expedient and fairly well equipped hunting camp, and I should have been asleep in no time. It turns out I was a little excited and couldn't sleep, or maybe it was the cold that I somehow didn't notice I had caught until I was on my way south. Either way, there was lots of tossing and turning and then a lack of desire to get on the move when the 5am alarm went off.
Dragging @$$ in a major way, I was on the trail and didn't make it far when the hint of the rising sun started making the surroundings apparent. I was actually right where my friend had told me to be on opening morning though, but I had company in the area and the other hunter's headlamp was way up the hill. I took a seat anyway and started glassing. It wasn't long before I had enough light to find a couple does out feeding on a hillside, then some more way up the hill. I didn't see that monster buck 60 yards away like my friend promised me though. After a few hours, I decided to move on up the hill and have a look around. Trying to gain elevation made me realize how sick I was, as I had little energy. An hour or two further up, I found myself in a nice glassing spot and spent some time looking through the binoculars. And then some time trying to look through my eyelids... At about 4 PM I had woken up from my second nap (yeah, lunch induced another one) and I decided to sneak over to the other side of the hill I was on. As soon as I crested the hill, I noticed deer. Deer being plural. All the sudden I was watching 10-15 deer coming out of the shadows on the hillside. After looking around more, I saw a couple still hiding pretty well and one had antlers. Respectable antlers that is, as many of the others were small bucks. At about the same time I spotted him, I realized how bad my optics must be reflecting from the low sun, as that buck got up and disappeared before I could really size him up. Some of the other ones decided to do the same but some of them stayed. Another buck kind of came out of nowhere and stood on the skyline looking at me, testing me more like it. He was testing to see if I could stick to my plan of not just shooting the first decent buck I got a chance at.
I maintained my will power, holding out for a big boy since I had waited three years for this hunt. The following morning I found myself way up the hill at first light. There were deer out feeding, several does, a few small bucks and one sizable buck. I got a good look at him through the spotting scope and decided he wasn't the one either. He was a 3x4 with pretty nice dimensions but not much mass. ( I actually got a real close look at this deer the following day as that other hunter that kept beating me up the mountain was packing him out, he was a nice buck and made a sweet double for this guy that also killed a bull elk on the opening day)
Day two finished out fairly uneventful, with passing up a couple more smaller four points and seeing a bunch of does as the sun was setting.
On the third day, I decided to look at some other areas in the morning, while nursing a blister too. I didn't venture so far from the truck but did see a few deer. The only buck I had to decide on was a forked horn, which made the decision pretty quick. By mid-day, I had had enough of the road hunters in the same area and went back to the big hill. So much for nursing that blister as now I had half a day to cover the same ground. I made it up to the area where I had seen the most activity during the evening of the opening day and was disappointed to only see a couple does. I did catch a bull elk doing a cross-country run though which is still exciting even when you don't have an elk license in your pocket. This bull was spooked and on the move. The only thing on his mind was a new zip code. The poor boy's tongue was hanging out so far I could see it through the binoculars.
Right before seeing that bull, I had crossed paths with the other hunter who was packing that 3x4 Buck down the hill. Knowing that he had been in the area I was headed, I considered making the big hike to the other side of the draw but couldn't find the energy. I stayed on my course and wanted to be in what was my favorite area for the evening. As I was hiking around I saw a few of those airborne scavengers circling and figured it must be the kill site from that 3x4. I went to check it out, with the thought that there might be a chance of seeing a bear, or some other furry monster I don't even know about. I was surprised to see a coyote trying to get in on the action but being attacked by the crows. I was also surprised I was 60 yards from a coyote that didn't have a clue I was there. That is a rare opportunity that I couldn't pass up...
The evening was uneventful and it left me thinking I had seen every buck this draw had to offer and I had planned to do some more hiking around in that other area the following morning.
The next morning, I made it to the end of a road in some foothills and setup to watch a hillside as the sun was rising.
As the hillside started becoming visible, I started seeing herds of deer feeding up it. Doe, doe, fawn, fawn, doe, doe, fawn, doe, fawn, doe, coyote? Then more does. The coyote seemed to be trailing the deer and he had their attention. They pretty much walked right past me and I was surprised they didn't spook from the reflection that must have been coming off my optics. The coyote went out of sight and never re-appeared which was good thinking on his part...
After the does and fawns all made it up the hill into the brush and cedars, I decided to walk around the base of the hill further. It wasn't too long before I was staring at a little 4pt buck that didn't know I was there either. It was still a couple days too early to shoot a little buck so I just let him do his thing and soon enough he was gone. I took a couple steps and then notice deer legs coming up a dry creek bed to the same place the previous buck was. A smaller buck appeared and did the same thing. I then noticed two more coming and got excited thinking the big boy would be trailing behind but they just kept getting smaller. The last two seemed to want to hang out there and I wanted to get a move on so I decided to use them to test my stalking skills. I had the wind in my favor and will admit they weren't very alert, but I got to 15-20 yards of them before they noticed me. That would have been fun with a bow.
After they spooked off, I spent a couple more hours heading up and around the hill, but only crossed paths with a single doe. I was amazed at how many deer and elk tracks I saw on this little hillside though.
Around noon, it was time to move on. I didn't have a plan but when I drove up on the trailhead of the main draw where I had been the previous three days, and saw no other hunters parked there I decided to give it another go. I wasn't 100 yards up the trail before I ran into a half dozen does, which just let me walk right by at 50 yards. Another couple hundred yards up the trail I saw a few more deer which included a little buck. I had a feeling that this was going to be a good trip up the mountain as I hadn't seen deer this low before. An hour or so later I jumped a couple more does but then found nothing on the hillside where I was hoping to see that buck from the opening day sleeping. I set up and glassed everything I could see but did not see any deer. Disappointed, I started crossing to the other side of the draw to hike back to the truck though some areas I hadn't been through.
I was working my way down a fairly rocky slope looking at a thick timbered area at the bottom of a draw and thought this would be the perfect place for a big buck to hang out and just let me walk all over his mountain for three days thinking he didn't exist. Then I saw him. At about 150 yards, there he was...browsing and facing me head on. One quick glance through the binoculars had me switching to the rifle. I was in the wide open and I knew as soon as he saw me he would be gone and I would never find him in that timber again. I had the rifle up free-hand and he had just started to turn and walk, exposing his shoulder to me and I squeezed the trigger. Then I squeezed it harder. Then I tried to break it off and wondered to myself what happened to that crisp 2.5 lb trigger I had worked so hard tuning and he was gone. I have been packing rifles uncocked lately, by closing the bolt on a pulled trigger as a safe way of carrying one with a full capacity but not relying entirely on the safety. I think this is a better way to carry one strapped to a pack and it just takes a quick up and down of the bolt handle to have it ready to fire. In this case, I had done that up and down so quietly that I failed to get the sear to engage, so it was still uncocked. Thinking I had just missed my one and only chance at him, I started looking for him through the binoculars again, he wasn't spooked and couldn't have went far but I couldn't see any part of him. I decided to move laterally a little bit to get a different angle on where he must have been browsing. As I made this move, rocks slid down the hill and sticks broke. Thankfully I had enough wind to cover that noise and I made it to a little rocky point. My timing was perfect because he had just came into another opening and still didn't have a clue I was there. I knelt down and was able to rest the forend on a rock and found him in the scope. He was leisurely walking along and I reminded myself that I can shoot one on the walk which is a concept that haunts me often from letting a bull elk walk right away the previous year thinking he would stop when he didn't. I also got some practice with this in Africa and had the confidence. Somewhere during all this thought, I must have put the crosshairs on him and squeezed the trigger, because I herd the rifle go off and saw him rolling down the hill. The little rifle and the 140gr Accubond had performed very well and the buck was done for.
I had just killed a really cool buck, out by myself, with very little daylight left, about a mile and a half from the truck, and I had just done the math on that... I set up the camera for some pictures, then I tried to position the buck and I almost got to watch the buck roll right over my camera. After fighting him rolling a couple more times, I decided to drag him down to some flatter ground where it would be easier to work with him.
I shot him around 5:45 and had finally started processing him around 6:30 with the official sun set at 6:20. Working under the headlamp, I finally had the meat all boned out and in meat baggies about an hour later. My plan was to take half the meat and my gear down and come back for the other half of the meat and the head the next morning. Somehow I convinced myself that taking it all in one trip would be easier than climbing back up there in the morning, and proceeded to load it all up in my pack. It was a slow walk down the hill, but down the hill we went. Luckily it was down. I was carrying the head in one hand and using the tripod as a walking stick in the other hand. The weight of the head had me switching back and forth even more often than my knees and ankles had me stopping. In about an hour, we had made it down to the truck where gravity took over and things just started dropping to the ground. I loaded it all up and drove to where I was sharing camp with my friend's family, ready to show him off but they had given up on me and wet to sleep already.
As I went to transfer the meat into the coolers I had in the truck, I weighed everything with the fish scale I keep in the camper. I was very surprised at what I had just accomplished, as somehow I had just packed 120 lbs. down the hill.
After getting the meat on ice, it was time to celebrate. Jack Daniels was the next thing to come to mind and then I started cooking up some antelope fajitas for my feast.
Speaking of Antelope, I spotted this guy on the drive home. He was on private land in one of those units that typically takes a decade's worth of points to draw, but he caught my attention.
Back home and rested a bit, I decided it was time to do some taxidermy work, since this boy wasn't going to fit in the freezer. With some advice and the trusty stock pot from the guys at Gannett Ridge, the process began. After getting the skull fleshed out, it was really interesting to see that right antler base and how deformed the skull was.